Understanding what sections of your paper are graded and how they are graded is crucial to the development of your paper. *This rubric is for 2015 ONLY.

AoCMM 2017

9.27 - 10.10

Problems & Stats

Meet Winners

Judging Perspectives

AoCMM 2017 Scoring Rubric

#692 - Alpha

#725 - Beta

#726 - Beta

#734 - Beta

#744 - Beta

AoCMM 2016

10.4 - 10.18

Problems & Stats

Meet Winners

Judging Perspectives

AoCMM 2016 Scoring Rubric

#771 - Grand

#822 - Alpha

#824 - Alpha

#791 - Beta

#841 - Beta

AoCMM 2015

9.11 - 9.13

Problems & Stats

Meet Winners

Judging Perspectives

AoCMM 2015 Scoring Rubric

Understanding what sections of your paper are graded and how they are graded is crucial to the development of your paper. *This rubric is for 2015 ONLY.

This paper demonstrates a sufficient understanding of the first contest problem, but the competitors need to further enhance their math skills in order to develop an effective model for this problem.

#864 - Honorable Mention

Using normal distribution, this model solves the problem in an easily understandable manner but lacks proper analysis. Better explanation and organization could largely improve this paper.

#905 - Gamma

With the unique computational Monte Carlo Simulation approach, this paper solves both of the problems effectively with only a few minor flaws. However, some sections can be further elaborated to improve this paper.

#863 - Beta

This paper showed clear details on how the solution is arrived at. It would be a good idea to go further in depth with the explanations by using only relevant examples and information. Fix description formats and errors, and the result will be a more polished submission.

#985 - Alpha

The paper is neatly organized with all necessary parts which leave a very good first impression. Both of the models use a theoretical approach to the problems and derive the solution from pure theory, clearly demonstrating strong mathematical knowledge in probability distributions and spherical geometry.

#890 - Grand